PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 162 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Bangladesh
    96 / 100
    A
  2. Canada
    95 / 100
    A
  3. United States
    94 / 100
    A
  4. Finland
    94 / 100
    A
  5. Dominican Republic
    94 / 100
    A
  6. Germany
    93 / 100
    A
  7. United Kingdom
    93 / 100
    A
  8. South Africa
    93 / 100
    A
  9. Sweden
    93 / 100
    A
  10. Switzerland
    93 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 162 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 96 98.4% 100% 88% 83.7% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 95 95.7% 100% 85.8% 81.6% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 94 93.6% 99.9% 88.1% 79.9% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 94 94.2% 100% 86.4% 80.4% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 94 94.8% 100% 83.9% 80.8% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 93 91.2% 100% 86.9% 78% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 93 92.2% 99.9% 85.6% 78.8% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 93 93.9% 100% 84.1% 80.1% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 93 92.9% 100% 86.2% 79.3% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 93 92% 100% 84.3% 78.6% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 92 90.1% 100% 86.8% 77.1% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 92 90.8% 100% 84.9% 77.6% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 92 90.5% 100% 84.2% 77.4% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 92 90% 100% 86.2% 77% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 92 90.8% 100% 83.3% 77.6% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 91 86.6% 100% 86.4% 74.3% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 91 88.1% 100% 84.7% 75.5% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 90 83.9% 100% 88.6% 72.1% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 90 84.6% 100% 87.4% 72.7% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 89 83.3% 99.7% 87.1% 71.6% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 89 82.3% 99.8% 85.6% 70.8% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 89 82.2% 100% 87.5% 70.8% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 89 83.7% 100% 87.3% 72% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 89 84.5% 100% 85% 72.6% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 88 82% 100% 84.7% 70.6% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 88 80.7% 100% 86.1% 69.6% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 87 79.2% 97.6% 87.3% 68.4% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 87 79.4% 100% 86.2% 68.5% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 86 76.7% 99.9% 86.6% 66.4% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 86 74.4% 99.7% 88.7% 64.5% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 86 75.3% 100% 88.2% 65.2% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 86 73.7% 99.4% 89.9% 64% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 85 71.4% 99.8% 90.6% 62.1% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 85 73.5% 100% 87.9% 63.8% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 85 72.1% 100% 89% 62.7% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 85 73% 100% 88.1% 63.4% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 85 74.7% 100% 86.6% 64.8% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 85 72.3% 100% 87.9% 62.8% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 85 73.2% 98.2% 88.8% 63.6% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 84 72.1% 100% 87.2% 62.7% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 84 73.6% 100% 85% 63.9% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 83 69.7% 100% 87.6% 60.8% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 83 68.9% 100% 88.5% 60.1% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 83 68% 100% 88.8% 59.4% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 82 66.8% 100% 86.9% 58.4% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 82 65.7% 100% 90.7% 57.6% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 82 68.6% 100% 84.7% 59.9% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 82 69.1% 100% 85.1% 60.3% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 82 68% 100% 85.5% 59.4% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 82 66.2% 100% 87.4% 58% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 82 65.3% 100% 91.1% 57.2% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 81 63% 100% 88.5% 55.4% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine 81 65.1% 100% 86.2% 57.1% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 80 63% 100% 87.8% 55.4% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 79 57.1% 100% 91.4% 50.7% B
56 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 79 58.6% 100% 88.8% 51.9% B
57 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 78 60.1% 100% 85.4% 53.1% B
58 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 78 56.1% 99.1% 91.4% 49.9% B
59 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 78 56.2% 100% 91.7% 50% B
60 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 78 58.7% 100% 87.5% 52% B
61 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 78 58% 100% 86.7% 51.4% B
62 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 77 54.3% 100% 90.5% 48.4% B
63 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 77 56.8% 100% 86.9% 50.4% B
64 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Morocco 77 53.6% 100% 92.8% 47.9% B
65 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 76 51.7% 99.2% 93.3% 46.4% B
66 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 75 48.1% 100% 91.8% 43.5% B
67 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 75 52.5% 100% 86.3% 47% B
68 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 75 51.3% 98.7% 88.5% 46% B
69 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 75 49.1% 100% 90.1% 44.3% B
70 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 75 50% 100% 91% 45% B
71 ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen 75 50% 100% 90.4% 45% B
72 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 74 47.9% 100% 87.9% 43.3% B
73 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 74 48.6% 100% 89.6% 43.9% B
74 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 74 51.4% 100% 84.2% 46.1% B
75 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 73 47.1% 100% 88.4% 42.7% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 72 41.9% 99.8% 93.7% 38.5% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 72 44% 100% 86.7% 40.2% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 72 42.9% 100% 91.3% 39.3% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 71 41.6% 100% 88.2% 38.3% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 70 38.9% 100% 88% 36.1% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 69 33.5% 99.1% 94.8% 31.8% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 69 37.8% 100% 87.9% 35.2% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 69 36.8% 100% 89.1% 34.4% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 69 38.5% 100% 86.5% 35.8% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 69 36.4% 100% 90.7% 34.1% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 69 36.4% 100% 89.1% 34.1% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ Seychelles 69 36.4% 100% 89% 34.1% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 68 37.3% 100% 86.5% 34.8% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 68 33.9% 100% 88.7% 32.1% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 68 35.6% 100% 87.9% 33.5% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 68 35.1% 100% 86.9% 33.1% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 68 36.4% 100% 86.5% 34.1% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 67 34.1% 100% 87.6% 32.3% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 67 35.1% 100% 86.1% 33.1% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Eswatini 67 33.3% 100% 87.4% 31.6% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 66 32.1% 100% 86.7% 30.7% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan 66 31.3% 100% 86.5% 30% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 65 28.6% 100% 86.3% 27.9% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 65 28.6% 100% 87.1% 27.9% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น Malta 65 27.8% 100% 87.8% 27.2% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 64 26.6% 100% 86.4% 26.3% C
102 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 64 26.1% 100% 87.2% 25.9% C
103 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 64 28.1% 100% 85.8% 27.5% C
104 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 64 27.6% 100% 87.2% 27.1% C
105 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Sierra Leone 64 26.7% 100% 86.5% 26.4% C
106 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 63 25% 100% 86.5% 25% C
107 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 63 24.4% 100% 87.6% 24.5% C
108 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 63 24.4% 100% 85.9% 24.5% C
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 63 25.6% 100% 86.3% 25.5% C
110 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 63 26.1% 100% 86.5% 25.9% C
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 63 25% 100% 85.4% 25% C
112 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 62 21.3% 100% 89.2% 22% C
113 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 62 22.4% 100% 86.8% 22.9% C
114 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 62 22.2% 100% 87.4% 22.8% C
115 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 62 23.5% 100% 86.9% 23.8% C
116 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana 62 22.2% 100% 87% 22.8% C
117 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 61 19.7% 100% 87.3% 20.8% C
118 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 61 20.7% 100% 86.5% 21.6% C
119 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 61 20.7% 100% 87.4% 21.6% C
120 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 60 17.5% 100% 86.5% 19% C
121 ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 60 18.2% 100% 85.9% 19.6% C
122 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados 60 19% 100% 86.3% 20.2% C
123 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 59 15.3% 100% 87% 17.2% C
124 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 59 15.3% 100% 86.9% 17.2% C
125 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 59 16% 100% 87.1% 17.8% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 59 15.9% 100% 86.7% 17.7% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 59 14.8% 100% 87% 16.8% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Madagascar 59 16% 100% 86.5% 17.8% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ Guyana 59 15.8% 100% 86.3% 17.6% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 58 14.4% 100% 86.6% 16.5% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 58 13% 100% 86.5% 15.4% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 57 11.1% 100% 87.6% 13.9% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 57 10.4% 100% 87% 13.3% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 57 10.9% 100% 86.5% 13.7% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 57 12.2% 100% 86.6% 14.8% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 57 10.5% 100% 87% 13.4% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan 57 11.8% 100% 86.5% 14.4% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 57 11.5% 100% 87% 14.2% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 56 8.5% 100% 86.6% 11.8% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 56 8.7% 100% 87.1% 12% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 56 10% 100% 87.2% 13% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 56 8.7% 100% 86.5% 12% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ท Mauritania 56 9.1% 100% 86.6% 12.3% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป Maldives 56 10% 100% 86.5% 13% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 55 6.3% 100% 86.9% 10% C
146 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 55 0.9% 100% 97.5% 5.7% C
147 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 55 7.1% 100% 86.6% 10.7% C
148 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 55 7.3% 100% 87.4% 10.8% C
149 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 55 8.3% 100% 86.5% 11.6% C
150 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 55 6.7% 100% 86.2% 10.4% C
151 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 54 4.8% 100% 86.3% 8.8% C
152 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 53 2.4% 100% 86.5% 6.9% C
153 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 53 2.6% 100% 86.5% 7.1% C
154 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 53 3.2% 100% 86.5% 7.6% C
155 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 53 3.8% 100% 86.3% 8% C
156 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 52 0% 100% 86.9% 5% C
157 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 52 0% 100% 86.5% 5% C
158 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo 52 0% 100% 86.5% 5% C
159 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ Timor-Leste 52 0% 100% 86.1% 5% C
160 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ผ Curaรงao 52 0% 100% 86.5% 5% C
161 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ Burundi 52 0% 100% 86.5% 5% C
162 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Gabon 52 0% 100% 86.5% 5% C

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Gabon (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ Burundi (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ผ Curaรงao (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ Timor-Leste (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.2%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (2.6%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related