DNS Privacy Score by Country
How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .
These scores are calculated from live probe data โ not self-reported claims. We test 150 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.
Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.
Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.
Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.
Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.
Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries
Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.
-
98 / 100A
-
98 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
96 / 100A
-
96 / 100A
-
96 / 100A
Full Country Rankings
| Rank | Country | Score | DNSSEC % | Hijack-Free % | Reliability % | Encrypted % | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ง๐ฉ Bangladesh | 98 | 98.5% | 100% | 94.2% | 83.8% | A |
| 2 | ๐ฉ๐ด Dominican Republic | 98 | 98.6% | 100% | 94.3% | 83.9% | A |
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 97 | 95.8% | 99.1% | 95.6% | 81.6% | A |
| 4 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 97 | 95.9% | 99.5% | 95.4% | 81.7% | A |
| 5 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 97 | 96.7% | 99.6% | 95.3% | 82.4% | A |
| 6 | ๐ช๐จ Ecuador | 97 | 96% | 100% | 93.7% | 81.8% | A |
| 7 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | 97 | 96% | 100% | 95.4% | 81.8% | A |
| 8 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 96 | 93.3% | 99.5% | 95.3% | 79.6% | A |
| 9 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 96 | 92.7% | 99.6% | 95.4% | 79.2% | A |
| 10 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 96 | 94.4% | 99.7% | 95.1% | 80.5% | A |
| 11 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 96 | 94.9% | 100% | 93.2% | 80.9% | A |
| 12 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 96 | 95.5% | 97.4% | 95.3% | 81.4% | A |
| 13 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 95 | 91.1% | 100% | 94.7% | 77.9% | A |
| 14 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 94 | 90.3% | 99.3% | 94.4% | 77.2% | A |
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 94 | 90.5% | 99.4% | 95.2% | 77.4% | A |
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 93 | 88.8% | 99.5% | 94.1% | 76% | A |
| 17 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 93 | 89.4% | 96.1% | 95% | 76.5% | A |
| 18 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 93 | 87.5% | 100% | 94.5% | 75% | A |
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 93 | 89.2% | 99.4% | 92.8% | 76.4% | A |
| 20 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 93 | 88.4% | 100% | 91.9% | 75.7% | A |
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 93 | 90% | 95% | 94.6% | 77% | A |
| 22 | ๐ป๐ช Venezuela | 92 | 86.9% | 100% | 92.1% | 74.5% | A |
| 23 | ๐ต๐ธ Palestine | 92 | 85.7% | 100% | 93.7% | 73.6% | A |
| 24 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 91 | 83.8% | 99% | 95.7% | 72% | A |
| 25 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia | 91 | 83.3% | 99.6% | 92.7% | 71.6% | A |
| 26 | ๐ฑ๐พ Libya | 91 | 84.2% | 100% | 92.7% | 72.4% | A |
| 27 | ๐น๐ท Turkiye | 91 | 84.2% | 98.2% | 94.8% | 72.4% | A |
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 91 | 82.6% | 100% | 94.2% | 71.1% | A |
| 29 | ๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia | 91 | 84.6% | 96.2% | 95.6% | 72.7% | A |
| 30 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 90 | 80.9% | 100% | 93.6% | 69.7% | A |
| 31 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine | 90 | 80.6% | 99.5% | 93.1% | 69.5% | A |
| 32 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 89 | 78.7% | 99.7% | 94.2% | 68% | A |
| 33 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 89 | 77.8% | 100% | 95.4% | 67.2% | A |
| 34 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 89 | 78.5% | 100% | 94.6% | 67.8% | A |
| 35 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 89 | 80.7% | 95.1% | 94.8% | 69.6% | A |
| 36 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 89 | 79.1% | 100% | 94.2% | 68.3% | A |
| 37 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 89 | 80.7% | 98.2% | 93% | 69.6% | A |
| 38 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 89 | 78% | 100% | 95.5% | 67.4% | A |
| 39 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala | 88 | 76.6% | 99.1% | 92.7% | 66.3% | A |
| 40 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 88 | 77.3% | 96.9% | 94.9% | 66.8% | A |
| 41 | ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand | 88 | 81.5% | 90.7% | 94.4% | 70.2% | A |
| 42 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 88 | 76.2% | 100% | 94.5% | 66% | A |
| 43 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 88 | 85.2% | 85.2% | 93.2% | 73.2% | A |
| 44 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 87 | 74.7% | 100% | 94.4% | 64.8% | A |
| 45 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 87 | 76.1% | 95.7% | 96% | 65.9% | A |
| 46 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 87 | 74.4% | 100% | 94.5% | 64.5% | A |
| 47 | ๐ต๐ฐ Pakistan | 87 | 73.7% | 100% | 93.5% | 64% | A |
| 48 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra | 87 | 73.9% | 100% | 93.5% | 64.1% | A |
| 49 | ๐พ๐ช Yemen | 87 | 75% | 100% | 94.1% | 65% | A |
| 50 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | 86 | 71.4% | 100% | 93.5% | 62.1% | A |
| 51 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 86 | 74.1% | 97.6% | 94.9% | 64.3% | A |
| 52 | ๐ญ๐ณ Honduras | 86 | 72.7% | 100% | 91.8% | 63.2% | A |
| 53 | ๐ด๐ฒ Oman | 86 | 70.3% | 100% | 95% | 61.2% | A |
| 54 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbia | 85 | 71.7% | 98.1% | 93.5% | 62.4% | A |
| 55 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 85 | 73.1% | 92.3% | 94.4% | 63.5% | A |
| 56 | ๐ง๐พ Belarus | 84 | 68% | 100% | 93.4% | 59.4% | A |
| 57 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 83 | 63.8% | 100% | 94.7% | 56% | A |
| 58 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria | 83 | 64.9% | 100% | 93.7% | 56.9% | A |
| 59 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 83 | 64.4% | 100% | 94.2% | 56.5% | A |
| 60 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Armenia | 83 | 69.2% | 92.3% | 93.5% | 60.4% | A |
| 61 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | 82 | 64.6% | 97.9% | 92.4% | 56.7% | A |
| 62 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | 82 | 64.8% | 96.3% | 94.8% | 56.8% | A |
| 63 | ๐ต๐ท Puerto Rico | 82 | 64.2% | 98.1% | 94.4% | 56.4% | A |
| 64 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia | 82 | 62.8% | 100% | 93.9% | 55.2% | A |
| 65 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Moldova | 82 | 62.5% | 100% | 94.6% | 55% | A |
| 66 | ๐น๐ผ Taiwan | 81 | 64.5% | 94.6% | 94.5% | 56.6% | A |
| 67 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Albania | 81 | 61.4% | 100% | 93.4% | 54.1% | A |
| 68 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | 79 | 56.8% | 100% | 94.1% | 50.4% | B |
| 69 | ๐ต๐พ Paraguay | 78 | 54.7% | 100% | 93.7% | 48.8% | B |
| 70 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 78 | 53.7% | 100% | 95.5% | 48% | B |
| 71 | ๐น๐ณ Tunisia | 78 | 60.6% | 90.9% | 93.5% | 53.5% | B |
| 72 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 77 | 52.5% | 100% | 93.5% | 47% | B |
| 73 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 77 | 58% | 88% | 94.6% | 51.4% | B |
| 74 | ๐ฟ๐ฒ Zambia | 77 | 54.2% | 100% | 91.9% | 48.4% | B |
| 75 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 76 | 50.2% | 97.4% | 95.4% | 45.2% | B |
| 76 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 76 | 50% | 100% | 93.2% | 45% | B |
| 77 | ๐ฟ๐ผ Zimbabwe | 76 | 52.4% | 97.6% | 91.8% | 46.9% | B |
| 78 | ๐จ๐ฉ DR Congo | 76 | 52.9% | 97.1% | 92.5% | 47.3% | B |
| 79 | ๐ท๐ผ Rwanda | 76 | 50% | 100% | 92.4% | 45% | B |
| 80 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia | 76 | 50% | 100% | 94% | 45% | B |
| 81 | ๐ฌ๐ช Georgia | 76 | 50% | 100% | 93.2% | 45% | B |
| 82 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 75 | 48.4% | 99.6% | 93.4% | 43.7% | B |
| 83 | ๐ฒ๐ฟ Mozambique | 75 | 50% | 100% | 91.4% | 45% | B |
| 84 | ๐ธ๐ป El Salvador | 74 | 56.9% | 86.2% | 88.4% | 50.5% | B |
| 85 | ๐ธ๐ฉ Sudan | 74 | 50% | 92.9% | 92.3% | 45% | B |
| 86 | ๐ฐ๐ช Kenya | 73 | 49.2% | 90.2% | 93.3% | 44.4% | B |
| 87 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 73 | 46.4% | 92.9% | 95.4% | 42.1% | B |
| 88 | ๐ฌ๐พ Guyana | 73 | 42.9% | 100% | 93.6% | 39.3% | B |
| 89 | ๐ณ๐ฌ Nigeria | 72 | 40.7% | 100% | 93.1% | 37.6% | B |
| 90 | ๐ฝ๐ฐ Kosovo | 72 | 41.3% | 100% | 92.5% | 38% | B |
| 91 | ๐ฒ๐บ Mauritius | 72 | 41.2% | 100% | 92.8% | 38% | B |
| 92 | ๐ธ๐ด Somalia | 71 | 43.8% | 93.8% | 91.2% | 40% | B |
| 93 | ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbekistan | 70 | 39.1% | 95.7% | 93.9% | 36.3% | B |
| 94 | ๐ณ๐ฆ Namibia | 70 | 40% | 97.1% | 92.5% | 37% | B |
| 95 | ๐ฌ๐ถ Equatorial Guinea | 70 | 38.1% | 100% | 92.3% | 35.5% | B |
| 96 | ๐ต๐ญ Philippines | 69 | 33% | 100% | 95% | 31.4% | B |
| 97 | ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolia | 69 | 36.2% | 100% | 92.4% | 34% | B |
| 98 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 69 | 42.5% | 85% | 94.9% | 39% | B |
| 99 | ๐ง๐ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69 | 40% | 93.3% | 92.3% | 37% | B |
| 100 | ๐ณ๐ฎ Nicaragua | 67 | 33.3% | 93.9% | 92.1% | 31.6% | B |
| 101 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Jamaica | 67 | 30% | 100% | 93.9% | 29% | B |
| 102 | ๐จ๐ฒ Cameroon | 67 | 32% | 100% | 89.9% | 30.6% | B |
| 103 | ๐ฒ๐ฌ Madagascar | 67 | 30% | 100% | 93.1% | 29% | B |
| 104 | ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan | 66 | 27.7% | 100% | 95.3% | 27.2% | B |
| 105 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyzstan | 66 | 29.8% | 100% | 92% | 28.8% | B |
| 106 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Laos | 65 | 29.3% | 94.8% | 92.7% | 28.4% | B |
| 107 | ๐ฆ๐ด Angola | 65 | 26.8% | 97.6% | 91.9% | 26.4% | B |
| 108 | ๐ฒ๐ช Montenegro | 65 | 27.6% | 100% | 91.6% | 27.1% | B |
| 109 | ๐ง๐ฏ Benin | 65 | 27.3% | 100% | 92.5% | 26.8% | B |
| 110 | ๐ต๐ฌ Papua New Guinea | 65 | 25% | 100% | 93.4% | 25% | B |
| 111 | ๐ฌ๐บ Guam | 65 | 46.7% | 66.7% | 87.9% | 42.4% | B |
| 112 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka | 65 | 36.4% | 81.8% | 93.1% | 34.1% | B |
| 113 | ๐ง๐ด Bolivia | 64 | 23.1% | 100% | 92.8% | 23.5% | C |
| 114 | ๐จ๐ฌ Republic of the Congo | 64 | 24.3% | 100% | 93.6% | 24.4% | C |
| 115 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | 64 | 29% | 90.3% | 93% | 28.2% | C |
| 116 | ๐น๐ฌ Togo | 64 | 23.1% | 100% | 92.8% | 23.5% | C |
| 117 | ๐ฒ๐ฒ Myanmar | 63 | 24.3% | 96.1% | 92.3% | 24.4% | C |
| 118 | ๐น๐ฟ Tanzania | 63 | 26.4% | 90.6% | 92.4% | 26.1% | C |
| 119 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ North Macedonia | 63 | 22% | 98% | 94.3% | 22.6% | C |
| 120 | ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq | 63 | 20.5% | 100% | 94.6% | 21.4% | C |
| 121 | ๐ฑ๐ง Lebanon | 63 | 29.4% | 85.3% | 94.9% | 28.5% | C |
| 122 | ๐ท๐ช Rรฉunion | 63 | 20% | 100% | 93.9% | 21% | C |
| 123 | ๐บ๐ฌ Uganda | 62 | 23.3% | 91.3% | 92.6% | 23.6% | C |
| 124 | ๐ฆ๐ซ Afghanistan | 62 | 19.8% | 100% | 92.8% | 20.8% | C |
| 125 | ๐ณ๐ต Nepal | 62 | 20.7% | 98.8% | 92.6% | 21.6% | C |
| 126 | ๐ง๐ซ Burkina Faso | 62 | 20% | 100% | 93.2% | 21% | C |
| 127 | ๐ง๐ง Barbados | 62 | 18.8% | 100% | 92.7% | 20% | C |
| 128 | ๐ธ๐จ Seychelles | 62 | 30% | 80% | 94.1% | 29% | C |
| 129 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Cambodia | 61 | 25.2% | 87% | 91.5% | 25.2% | C |
| 130 | ๐ง๐ผ Botswana | 61 | 18.8% | 97.9% | 93.5% | 20% | C |
| 131 | ๐น๐น Trinidad and Tobago | 61 | 17.4% | 95.7% | 95.5% | 18.9% | C |
| 132 | ๐ฌ๐ณ Guinea | 61 | 17.6% | 100% | 90.4% | 19.1% | C |
| 133 | ๐น๐ฏ Tajikistan | 60 | 15.1% | 100% | 91.8% | 17.1% | C |
| 134 | ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain | 60 | 16.7% | 96.7% | 94.4% | 18.4% | C |
| 135 | ๐ฒ๐ด Macau | 60 | 20% | 90% | 94.5% | 21% | C |
| 136 | ๐ง๐น Bhutan | 60 | 15.8% | 100% | 91.3% | 17.6% | C |
| 137 | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay | 60 | 16.7% | 94.4% | 94.8% | 18.4% | C |
| 138 | ๐ฌ๐ญ Ghana | 59 | 17.1% | 93.4% | 91.8% | 18.7% | C |
| 139 | ๐จ๐ฎ Ivory Coast | 59 | 12.5% | 100% | 91.6% | 15% | C |
| 140 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 59 | 13.3% | 93.3% | 98% | 15.6% | C |
| 141 | ๐ช๐ฌ Egypt | 58 | 36.2% | 53.2% | 91.9% | 34% | C |
| 142 | ๐ฌ๐ซ French Guiana | 58 | 14.3% | 92.9% | 92.6% | 16.4% | C |
| 143 | ๐ง๐ฟ Belize | 57 | 7.1% | 100% | 94.6% | 10.7% | C |
| 144 | ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan | 54 | 13.5% | 78.4% | 93% | 15.8% | C |
| 145 | ๐ฒ๐ผ Malawi | 54 | 2.9% | 100% | 90.4% | 7.3% | C |
| 146 | ๐ณ๐จ New Caledonia | 54 | 2.9% | 97.1% | 93.4% | 7.3% | C |
| 147 | ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait | 53 | 9.7% | 83.9% | 92.9% | 12.8% | C |
| 148 | ๐ธ๐ธ South Sudan | 53 | 0% | 100% | 92.8% | 5% | C |
| 149 | ๐ฌ๐ต Guadeloupe | 51 | 4.5% | 81.8% | 94.2% | 8.6% | C |
| 150 | ๐ป๐ฌ British Virgin Islands | 40 | 10.7% | 28.6% | 91.9% | 13.6% | D |
Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.
Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns
- ๐ป๐ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 40/100, Grade D) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (10.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฌ๐ต Guadeloupe (Score: 51/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (4.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ธ๐ธ South Sudan (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (9.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ณ๐จ New Caledonia (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (2.9%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฒ๐ผ Malawi (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (2.9%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (13.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ง๐ฟ Belize (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฌ๐ซ French Guiana (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (14.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ช๐ฌ Egypt (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.
Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country
DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ like those in the European Union under GDPR โ tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.
In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.
The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.
This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the DNS privacy score measure?
The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.
Why does my country score poorly?
Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.
Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?
Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.
Which country has the best DNS privacy?
Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.
What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?
DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.
How often is this data updated?
Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.
Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?
Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.
How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?
We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.
Related
- DNS Privacy & Security Check โ test your personal DNS configuration
- Best Private DNS Servers โ recommended privacy-focused resolvers
- 2026 ISP DNS Report โ full NXDOMAIN hijacking analysis
- ISP DNS Servers by Country โ browse 4,367 ISPs