PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 146 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Dominican Republic
    100 / 100
    A
  2. Bangladesh
    99 / 100
    A
  3. United States
    98 / 100
    A
  4. Canada
    98 / 100
    A
  5. Peru
    98 / 100
    A
  6. Finland
    98 / 100
    A
  7. United Kingdom
    97 / 100
    A
  8. South Africa
    97 / 100
    A
  9. Sweden
    97 / 100
    A
  10. Ecuador
    97 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 146 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 100 100% 100% 98.4% 85% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 99 98.5% 100% 97.6% 83.8% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 98 95.7% 99.2% 98.8% 81.6% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 98 96.6% 99.5% 99.2% 82.3% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 98 96.5% 100% 98.7% 82.2% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 98 96.2% 100% 99% 82% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 97 94.4% 99.5% 98.8% 80.5% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 97 94.6% 100% 97.7% 80.7% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 97 94.5% 98.3% 98.7% 80.6% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 97 93% 100% 98.9% 79.4% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 96 92.5% 99.9% 98.9% 79% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 96 91.3% 99.5% 99% 78% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 96 91.4% 99.3% 98.6% 78.1% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 96 93% 100% 96.5% 79.4% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 95 91.1% 99.3% 97.4% 77.9% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 95 89.3% 100% 97.6% 76.4% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 94 90% 95.7% 99.3% 77% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 94 87.2% 100% 97.4% 74.8% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 94 90.1% 94.4% 99.4% 77.1% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 93 84.9% 99.4% 98% 72.9% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 93 86.5% 100% 95.6% 74.2% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 92 84.1% 98.6% 98.9% 72.3% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 92 84.6% 100% 95.1% 72.7% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 91 83% 94.3% 98.6% 71.4% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 91 81.8% 99.4% 96.2% 70.4% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 91 80% 100% 98.5% 69% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 91 81.8% 97.7% 97.3% 70.4% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine 91 81.8% 100% 97.7% 70.4% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 90 79.8% 99.7% 96.4% 68.8% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 90 80.2% 100% 97.2% 69.2% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 90 79.2% 100% 96.9% 68.4% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 90 81.1% 99.6% 95.5% 69.9% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 90 79.8% 100% 96.8% 68.8% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 90 83.3% 90.5% 98.9% 71.6% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ Guyana 90 81.8% 100% 93.2% 70.4% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 89 75.4% 100% 98.6% 65.3% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 89 76.6% 100% 97.2% 66.3% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 89 77.1% 100% 97.3% 66.7% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 89 78.2% 98.2% 98.2% 67.6% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 89 78% 98% 95.5% 67.4% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 89 75.6% 100% 98.6% 65.5% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 89 76.3% 100% 97% 66% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 88 75.8% 99% 97.3% 65.6% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 88 78.6% 90.5% 98.4% 67.9% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 88 75% 100% 96.5% 65% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 88 83.3% 83.3% 98.8% 71.6% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 88 73.9% 100% 97.1% 64.1% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 88 77.3% 95.5% 98% 66.8% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 87 74.3% 99.2% 95.3% 64.4% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 87 74.7% 97.5% 97.5% 64.8% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 87 73.7% 100% 96.7% 64% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 87 72.2% 100% 97.3% 62.8% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 87 76.9% 92.3% 97.2% 66.5% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 87 72.2% 100% 97.8% 62.8% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 86 71.4% 100% 96.8% 62.1% A
56 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 86 81.6% 78.9% 97.4% 70.3% A
57 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 86 71% 96.8% 97.4% 61.8% A
58 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 85 69.2% 100% 96.9% 60.4% A
59 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 85 67.8% 100% 95.9% 59.2% A
60 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 85 67.1% 100% 98.8% 58.7% A
61 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 84 65.9% 100% 97.5% 57.7% A
62 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 84 66.7% 100% 96.6% 58.4% A
63 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 83 64.6% 95.8% 99% 56.7% A
64 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 81 58.9% 100% 96.2% 52.1% A
65 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 81 58.6% 100% 96.8% 51.9% A
66 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 80 58.5% 98.8% 97.1% 51.8% A
67 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 80 61.3% 93.5% 97.2% 54% A
68 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 80 61.5% 92.3% 97.9% 54.2% A
69 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 79 55.8% 100% 95.8% 49.6% B
70 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 79 54.3% 100% 98.3% 48.4% B
71 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 79 54.8% 100% 97.7% 48.8% B
72 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 78 54.2% 100% 94.1% 48.4% B
73 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 78 53.2% 100% 95.6% 47.6% B
74 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 78 53.2% 100% 96.7% 47.6% B
75 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 78 58.3% 89.6% 97.4% 51.6% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 78 59.4% 87.5% 98% 52.5% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 78 53.3% 100% 95.1% 47.6% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 77 57.8% 86.7% 97.8% 51.2% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 76 50% 100% 95.7% 45% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 76 50% 100% 94.7% 45% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 76 53.3% 93.3% 95.9% 47.6% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 75 47.7% 100% 95.9% 43.2% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 75 45.5% 100% 96.3% 41.4% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 74 44.1% 97.3% 97.7% 40.3% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 74 43.8% 100% 97.2% 40% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 74 43.8% 100% 96.4% 40% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 73 43.2% 99.5% 94.9% 39.6% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 73 42.4% 100% 96.7% 38.9% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 73 46.9% 93.8% 95.1% 42.5% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 73 42.3% 100% 96.7% 38.8% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 73 42.1% 100% 96.1% 38.7% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 73 46.2% 92.3% 97.5% 42% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 72 39.3% 100% 95.2% 36.4% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 72 39.1% 100% 96.9% 36.3% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados 72 40% 100% 97% 37% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 72 42.9% 92.9% 97.6% 39.3% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 71 38.1% 95.2% 99.6% 35.5% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 71 36.8% 100% 96.3% 34.4% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 71 53.3% 80% 89.6% 47.6% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 70 35.7% 100% 96.2% 33.6% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 70 35.1% 100% 96% 33.1% B
102 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 70 34.2% 100% 97.6% 32.4% B
103 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 70 36.7% 100% 93.9% 34.4% B
104 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 70 34.6% 100% 96.7% 32.7% B
105 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 68 30.4% 98.2% 97.1% 29.3% B
106 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 68 31.8% 100% 92.7% 30.4% B
107 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 67 30.8% 95.6% 97.7% 29.6% B
108 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 67 30.8% 94.2% 97.4% 29.6% B
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 67 30.8% 100% 92.4% 29.6% B
110 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 67 33.3% 91.7% 97.7% 31.6% B
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 66 25.5% 97.9% 97.9% 25.4% B
112 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 66 27.9% 100% 94.4% 27.3% B
113 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 66 28.2% 97.4% 97.3% 27.6% B
114 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 66 28.6% 97.1% 96.5% 27.9% B
115 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 66 31% 93.1% 95.2% 29.8% B
116 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 66 28.6% 100% 93.1% 27.9% B
117 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 65 26.9% 94.2% 95.9% 26.5% B
118 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 65 32.1% 82.1% 98.7% 30.7% B
119 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 65 26.1% 95.7% 98.1% 25.9% B
120 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 65 25% 100% 94.2% 25% B
121 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 64 26.1% 91.3% 95.8% 25.9% C
122 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 64 22.2% 100% 96.5% 22.8% C
123 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 64 29.4% 85.3% 98.3% 28.5% C
124 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 64 22.2% 100% 95.5% 22.8% C
125 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 63 18.8% 100% 97.6% 20% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 63 23.1% 92.3% 98.7% 23.5% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 63 22.2% 94.4% 98.2% 22.8% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana 62 18.2% 100% 94.1% 19.6% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 61 24.3% 82.9% 97% 24.4% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 61 18% 95.1% 96.1% 19.4% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 61 14% 100% 96.8% 16.2% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 61 16.7% 96.7% 98.3% 18.4% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 61 13.3% 100% 98.6% 15.6% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 61 25% 83.3% 97.2% 25% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 60 13.3% 97.8% 96.9% 15.6% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 58 11.1% 94.4% 98.3% 13.9% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 58 6.7% 100% 98.7% 10.4% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 58 8.3% 100% 97% 11.6% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo 58 9.1% 100% 96.5% 12.3% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 56 10.7% 89.3% 96.4% 13.6% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 56 12% 84% 97.9% 14.6% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 56 4.3% 100% 94% 8.4% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 55 3.8% 96.2% 96.8% 8% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 54 7.4% 85.2% 97.2% 10.9% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 54 0% 100% 95.6% 5% C
146 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 39 11.5% 23.1% 93.3% 14.2% D

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 39/100, Grade D) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (11.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.4%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (4.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (12%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (10.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (9.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (6.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related