PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 145 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Bangladesh
    99 / 100
    A
  2. Peru
    99 / 100
    A
  3. Dominican Republic
    99 / 100
    A
  4. Canada
    98 / 100
    A
  5. Finland
    98 / 100
    A
  6. United States
    97 / 100
    A
  7. France
    97 / 100
    A
  8. United Kingdom
    97 / 100
    A
  9. South Africa
    97 / 100
    A
  10. Switzerland
    97 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 145 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 99 99.5% 100% 96.7% 84.6% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 99 98.4% 100% 99.2% 83.7% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 99 98.9% 100% 98.8% 84.1% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 98 96.4% 99.6% 99.5% 82.1% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 98 95.9% 99% 99% 81.7% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 97 95.6% 98.2% 98.6% 81.5% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 97 93.2% 99.5% 99.3% 79.6% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 97 94.3% 99.1% 99% 80.4% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 97 94.3% 100% 97.7% 80.4% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 97 93.2% 100% 99.7% 79.6% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 97 94.7% 100% 97.5% 80.8% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 96 91.9% 99.6% 99.1% 78.5% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 96 91.9% 99.3% 97.4% 78.5% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 96 91.7% 99.2% 98.8% 78.4% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 96 92.8% 97.4% 98.8% 79.2% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 96 90.8% 100% 98.5% 77.6% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 95 89.6% 100% 98.8% 76.7% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 94 89.2% 100% 94.3% 76.4% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 94 89.9% 94.2% 99.4% 76.9% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 93 87.1% 99.5% 97.3% 74.7% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 93 86% 100% 95.5% 73.8% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 93 86.7% 100% 96.4% 74.4% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 92 82.7% 98.5% 99.1% 71.2% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 92 84% 100% 98.3% 72.2% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 92 83.5% 99.6% 96.6% 71.8% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 92 83.8% 100% 98.2% 72% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 91 82.5% 94.8% 98.9% 71% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 91 84.6% 97.4% 95.7% 72.7% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 91 81.6% 100% 96% 70.3% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 91 83.3% 94.4% 98.4% 71.6% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 90 80% 99.6% 96% 69% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 90 80.1% 98.7% 97% 69.1% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 90 79.7% 98.5% 98% 68.8% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 90 79.7% 98.6% 98.7% 68.8% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 90 78.8% 98.1% 98.5% 68% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 90 79.5% 100% 96.7% 68.6% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 90 77.8% 100% 98.4% 67.2% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 90 79.3% 100% 97.5% 68.4% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 90 85.7% 85.7% 99.7% 73.6% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ Guyana 90 80% 100% 97.3% 69% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 89 78.1% 100% 96.9% 67.5% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 89 77.7% 99.1% 97.8% 67.2% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 89 82.5% 90% 98.1% 71% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 88 75.7% 97.7% 96.6% 65.6% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 88 74.2% 100% 98.4% 64.4% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 88 76.7% 96.5% 97.7% 66.4% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 88 73.8% 100% 97.4% 64% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 88 77.5% 95% 97.5% 67% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 88 81.1% 86.5% 99.5% 69.9% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 88 73.5% 100% 97.4% 63.8% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 88 75% 100% 97.1% 65% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 88 75% 100% 96% 65% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 88 73.3% 100% 98% 63.6% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 87 72.5% 100% 97.5% 63% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 87 75.5% 98% 95.1% 65.4% A
56 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 86 69.8% 99.2% 96.8% 60.8% A
57 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 86 70.5% 100% 95.9% 61.4% A
58 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 85 68.1% 100% 98.3% 59.5% A
59 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 84 65.9% 100% 97.7% 57.7% A
60 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 84 68.8% 93.8% 95.8% 60% A
61 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 83 64.9% 100% 96.7% 56.9% A
62 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 82 61.3% 98.8% 96.8% 54% A
63 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 82 65.1% 93% 97.9% 57.1% A
64 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 82 60% 100% 98% 53% A
65 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 82 61.3% 100% 96.3% 54% A
66 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 81 64% 88% 98.8% 56.2% A
67 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 81 63.6% 90.9% 99% 55.9% A
68 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 81 60% 100% 97.2% 53% A
69 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 80 57.4% 100% 97.8% 50.9% A
70 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 80 55.6% 100% 98.9% 49.5% A
71 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 79 56.1% 100% 96.3% 49.9% B
72 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 79 54.9% 100% 97.6% 48.9% B
73 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 79 54.5% 100% 99% 48.6% B
74 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 78 58.1% 88.4% 97.3% 51.5% B
75 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 78 53.8% 100% 94.6% 48% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 78 58.3% 91.7% 96.7% 51.6% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 78 57.1% 92.9% 97.2% 50.7% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 77 50% 100% 97.3% 45% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 77 56% 92% 96.5% 49.8% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 76 50% 100% 95.6% 45% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 75 47.1% 97.1% 97.4% 42.7% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 75 46.7% 100% 97.3% 42.4% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 75 50% 92.9% 97.5% 45% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 74 44.3% 98.2% 97.8% 40.4% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 74 45.5% 100% 94.9% 41.4% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 74 51.2% 85.4% 98.5% 46% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 74 43.8% 100% 96.7% 40% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 74 50% 90% 97.4% 45% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 73 43.5% 99.5% 95.2% 39.8% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 73 40.7% 100% 98.1% 37.6% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 73 41.5% 100% 95.8% 38.2% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 73 52.4% 81% 95.6% 46.9% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 73 45.2% 96.8% 95.2% 41.2% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 73 40% 100% 98.4% 37% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 72 41.9% 96.5% 97.7% 38.5% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 72 39% 100% 97.4% 36.2% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 72 39.1% 100% 96.9% 36.3% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 71 36.8% 100% 96.8% 34.4% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 71 37% 100% 96.6% 34.6% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 71 38.9% 94.4% 99.3% 36.1% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 70 36.6% 100% 94.9% 34.3% B
102 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 70 37% 96.3% 95% 34.6% B
103 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 70 40% 90% 97.3% 37% B
104 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 70 53.8% 69.2% 95.7% 48% B
105 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 69 36.5% 94.2% 97.7% 34.2% B
106 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 69 36% 100% 92.7% 33.8% B
107 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 69 31.6% 100% 97.9% 30.3% B
108 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 68 33.3% 97% 96.4% 31.6% B
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 68 30% 100% 97.7% 29% B
110 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 68 32.1% 96.4% 96.1% 30.7% B
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 67 40% 80% 96.5% 37% B
112 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan 67 30% 100% 94.4% 29% B
113 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 66 27.3% 98.2% 97.9% 26.8% B
114 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 66 25.5% 97.9% 98.5% 25.4% B
115 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 66 25.7% 100% 96.7% 25.6% B
116 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 66 26.3% 100% 94.6% 26% B
117 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 65 28.2% 91.8% 96.7% 27.6% B
118 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 64 24.6% 95.7% 95.1% 24.7% C
119 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 64 25.9% 94.4% 96.4% 25.7% C
120 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 64 22.6% 100% 96.1% 23.1% C
121 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo 64 20% 100% 97.8% 21% C
122 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 63 18.5% 100% 98.8% 19.8% C
123 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 63 21.7% 95.7% 98.6% 22.4% C
124 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 63 22.2% 94.4% 96.1% 22.8% C
125 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 63 20% 100% 93.8% 21% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 62 17% 100% 96.4% 18.6% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 62 18.2% 100% 95.9% 19.6% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 62 25% 83.3% 98.8% 25% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 62 18.8% 93.8% 98% 20% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 62 25% 83.3% 98% 25% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana 62 18.2% 100% 96.8% 19.6% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 61 19.2% 92.3% 98.2% 20.4% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 60 21.4% 82.1% 97.9% 22.1% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 60 15% 97.5% 96.9% 17% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 59 10.5% 100% 96% 13.4% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 59 12.5% 93.8% 99.2% 15% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 58 7.1% 100% 98.5% 10.7% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 58 7.7% 100% 99.8% 11.2% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 58 16.7% 83.3% 98.4% 18.4% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 58 10% 100% 95.5% 13% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 55 0% 100% 98.6% 5% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 54 8% 84% 98.1% 11.4% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 53 0% 96.4% 95.2% 5% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 52 4.2% 83.3% 97.5% 8.4% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 41 11.5% 23.1% 98% 14.2% D

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 41/100, Grade D) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (11.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 52/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (4.2%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (10%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay (Score: 59/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (12.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related