DNS Privacy Score by Country
How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .
These scores are calculated from live probe data โ not self-reported claims. We test 146 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.
Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.
Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.
Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.
Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.
Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries
Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.
-
100 / 100A
-
99 / 100A
-
98 / 100A
-
98 / 100A
-
98 / 100A
-
98 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
-
97 / 100A
Full Country Rankings
| Rank | Country | Score | DNSSEC % | Hijack-Free % | Reliability % | Encrypted % | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ฉ๐ด Dominican Republic | 100 | 100% | 100% | 98.4% | 85% | A |
| 2 | ๐ง๐ฉ Bangladesh | 99 | 98.5% | 100% | 97.6% | 83.8% | A |
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 98 | 95.7% | 99.2% | 98.8% | 81.6% | A |
| 4 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 98 | 96.6% | 99.5% | 99.2% | 82.3% | A |
| 5 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | 98 | 96.5% | 100% | 98.7% | 82.2% | A |
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | 98 | 96.2% | 100% | 99% | 82% | A |
| 7 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 97 | 94.4% | 99.5% | 98.8% | 80.5% | A |
| 8 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 97 | 94.6% | 100% | 97.7% | 80.7% | A |
| 9 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 97 | 94.5% | 98.3% | 98.7% | 80.6% | A |
| 10 | ๐ช๐จ Ecuador | 97 | 93% | 100% | 98.9% | 79.4% | A |
| 11 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 96 | 92.5% | 99.9% | 98.9% | 79% | A |
| 12 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 96 | 91.3% | 99.5% | 99% | 78% | A |
| 13 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 96 | 91.4% | 99.3% | 98.6% | 78.1% | A |
| 14 | ๐ป๐ช Venezuela | 96 | 93% | 100% | 96.5% | 79.4% | A |
| 15 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 95 | 91.1% | 99.3% | 97.4% | 77.9% | A |
| 16 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 95 | 89.3% | 100% | 97.6% | 76.4% | A |
| 17 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 94 | 90% | 95.7% | 99.3% | 77% | A |
| 18 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 94 | 87.2% | 100% | 97.4% | 74.8% | A |
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 94 | 90.1% | 94.4% | 99.4% | 77.1% | A |
| 20 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 93 | 84.9% | 99.4% | 98% | 72.9% | A |
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 93 | 86.5% | 100% | 95.6% | 74.2% | A |
| 22 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 92 | 84.1% | 98.6% | 98.9% | 72.3% | A |
| 23 | ๐ฑ๐พ Libya | 92 | 84.6% | 100% | 95.1% | 72.7% | A |
| 24 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 91 | 83% | 94.3% | 98.6% | 71.4% | A |
| 25 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine | 91 | 81.8% | 99.4% | 96.2% | 70.4% | A |
| 26 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 91 | 80% | 100% | 98.5% | 69% | A |
| 27 | ๐น๐ท Turkiye | 91 | 81.8% | 97.7% | 97.3% | 70.4% | A |
| 28 | ๐ต๐ธ Palestine | 91 | 81.8% | 100% | 97.7% | 70.4% | A |
| 29 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 90 | 79.8% | 99.7% | 96.4% | 68.8% | A |
| 30 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 90 | 80.2% | 100% | 97.2% | 69.2% | A |
| 31 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 90 | 79.2% | 100% | 96.9% | 68.4% | A |
| 32 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia | 90 | 81.1% | 99.6% | 95.5% | 69.9% | A |
| 33 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala | 90 | 79.8% | 100% | 96.8% | 68.8% | A |
| 34 | ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand | 90 | 83.3% | 90.5% | 98.9% | 71.6% | A |
| 35 | ๐ฌ๐พ Guyana | 90 | 81.8% | 100% | 93.2% | 70.4% | A |
| 36 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 89 | 75.4% | 100% | 98.6% | 65.3% | A |
| 37 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 89 | 76.6% | 100% | 97.2% | 66.3% | A |
| 38 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 89 | 77.1% | 100% | 97.3% | 66.7% | A |
| 39 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 89 | 78.2% | 98.2% | 98.2% | 67.6% | A |
| 40 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbia | 89 | 78% | 98% | 95.5% | 67.4% | A |
| 41 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 89 | 75.6% | 100% | 98.6% | 65.5% | A |
| 42 | ๐ด๐ฒ Oman | 89 | 76.3% | 100% | 97% | 66% | A |
| 43 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 88 | 75.8% | 99% | 97.3% | 65.6% | A |
| 44 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 88 | 78.6% | 90.5% | 98.4% | 67.9% | A |
| 45 | ๐ต๐ฐ Pakistan | 88 | 75% | 100% | 96.5% | 65% | A |
| 46 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 88 | 83.3% | 83.3% | 98.8% | 71.6% | A |
| 47 | ๐ง๐พ Belarus | 88 | 73.9% | 100% | 97.1% | 64.1% | A |
| 48 | ๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia | 88 | 77.3% | 95.5% | 98% | 66.8% | A |
| 49 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 87 | 74.3% | 99.2% | 95.3% | 64.4% | A |
| 50 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 87 | 74.7% | 97.5% | 97.5% | 64.8% | A |
| 51 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 87 | 73.7% | 100% | 96.7% | 64% | A |
| 52 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 87 | 72.2% | 100% | 97.3% | 62.8% | A |
| 53 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Armenia | 87 | 76.9% | 92.3% | 97.2% | 66.5% | A |
| 54 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra | 87 | 72.2% | 100% | 97.8% | 62.8% | A |
| 55 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 86 | 71.4% | 100% | 96.8% | 62.1% | A |
| 56 | ๐ธ๐ป El Salvador | 86 | 81.6% | 78.9% | 97.4% | 70.3% | A |
| 57 | ๐จ๐ฉ DR Congo | 86 | 71% | 96.8% | 97.4% | 61.8% | A |
| 58 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 85 | 69.2% | 100% | 96.9% | 60.4% | A |
| 59 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria | 85 | 67.8% | 100% | 95.9% | 59.2% | A |
| 60 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | 85 | 67.1% | 100% | 98.8% | 58.7% | A |
| 61 | ๐ญ๐ณ Honduras | 84 | 65.9% | 100% | 97.5% | 57.7% | A |
| 62 | ๐ต๐ท Puerto Rico | 84 | 66.7% | 100% | 96.6% | 58.4% | A |
| 63 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | 83 | 64.6% | 95.8% | 99% | 56.7% | A |
| 64 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Albania | 81 | 58.9% | 100% | 96.2% | 52.1% | A |
| 65 | ๐ท๐ผ Rwanda | 81 | 58.6% | 100% | 96.8% | 51.9% | A |
| 66 | ๐น๐ผ Taiwan | 80 | 58.5% | 98.8% | 97.1% | 51.8% | A |
| 67 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 80 | 61.3% | 93.5% | 97.2% | 54% | A |
| 68 | ๐ช๐ฌ Egypt | 80 | 61.5% | 92.3% | 97.9% | 54.2% | A |
| 69 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 79 | 55.8% | 100% | 95.8% | 49.6% | B |
| 70 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 79 | 54.3% | 100% | 98.3% | 48.4% | B |
| 71 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia | 79 | 54.8% | 100% | 97.7% | 48.8% | B |
| 72 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 78 | 54.2% | 100% | 94.1% | 48.4% | B |
| 73 | ๐ต๐พ Paraguay | 78 | 53.2% | 100% | 95.6% | 47.6% | B |
| 74 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | 78 | 53.2% | 100% | 96.7% | 47.6% | B |
| 75 | ๐ฐ๐ช Kenya | 78 | 58.3% | 89.6% | 97.4% | 51.6% | B |
| 76 | ๐น๐ณ Tunisia | 78 | 59.4% | 87.5% | 98% | 52.5% | B |
| 77 | ๐ธ๐ด Somalia | 78 | 53.3% | 100% | 95.1% | 47.6% | B |
| 78 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 77 | 57.8% | 86.7% | 97.8% | 51.2% | B |
| 79 | ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan | 76 | 50% | 100% | 95.7% | 45% | B |
| 80 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia | 76 | 50% | 100% | 94.7% | 45% | B |
| 81 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Moldova | 76 | 53.3% | 93.3% | 95.9% | 47.6% | B |
| 82 | ๐ฝ๐ฐ Kosovo | 75 | 47.7% | 100% | 95.9% | 43.2% | B |
| 83 | ๐ฒ๐ฟ Mozambique | 75 | 45.5% | 100% | 96.3% | 41.4% | B |
| 84 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 74 | 44.1% | 97.3% | 97.7% | 40.3% | B |
| 85 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 74 | 43.8% | 100% | 97.2% | 40% | B |
| 86 | ๐ฒ๐บ Mauritius | 74 | 43.8% | 100% | 96.4% | 40% | B |
| 87 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 73 | 43.2% | 99.5% | 94.9% | 39.6% | B |
| 88 | ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolia | 73 | 42.4% | 100% | 96.7% | 38.9% | B |
| 89 | ๐ฟ๐ผ Zimbabwe | 73 | 46.9% | 93.8% | 95.1% | 42.5% | B |
| 90 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Jamaica | 73 | 42.3% | 100% | 96.7% | 38.8% | B |
| 91 | ๐ฌ๐ช Georgia | 73 | 42.1% | 100% | 96.1% | 38.7% | B |
| 92 | ๐ง๐ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73 | 46.2% | 92.3% | 97.5% | 42% | B |
| 93 | ๐ณ๐ฌ Nigeria | 72 | 39.3% | 100% | 95.2% | 36.4% | B |
| 94 | ๐ฌ๐ถ Equatorial Guinea | 72 | 39.1% | 100% | 96.9% | 36.3% | B |
| 95 | ๐ง๐ง Barbados | 72 | 40% | 100% | 97% | 37% | B |
| 96 | ๐ง๐น Bhutan | 72 | 42.9% | 92.9% | 97.6% | 39.3% | B |
| 97 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 71 | 38.1% | 95.2% | 99.6% | 35.5% | B |
| 98 | ๐ง๐ฏ Benin | 71 | 36.8% | 100% | 96.3% | 34.4% | B |
| 99 | ๐ฌ๐บ Guam | 71 | 53.3% | 80% | 89.6% | 47.6% | B |
| 100 | ๐ต๐ญ Philippines | 70 | 35.7% | 100% | 96.2% | 33.6% | B |
| 101 | ๐ฆ๐ซ Afghanistan | 70 | 35.1% | 100% | 96% | 33.1% | B |
| 102 | ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq | 70 | 34.2% | 100% | 97.6% | 32.4% | B |
| 103 | ๐ฒ๐ช Montenegro | 70 | 36.7% | 100% | 93.9% | 34.4% | B |
| 104 | ๐ณ๐ฆ Namibia | 70 | 34.6% | 100% | 96.7% | 32.7% | B |
| 105 | ๐ณ๐ต Nepal | 68 | 30.4% | 98.2% | 97.1% | 29.3% | B |
| 106 | ๐จ๐ฒ Cameroon | 68 | 31.8% | 100% | 92.7% | 30.4% | B |
| 107 | ๐ฒ๐ฒ Myanmar | 67 | 30.8% | 95.6% | 97.7% | 29.6% | B |
| 108 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Laos | 67 | 30.8% | 94.2% | 97.4% | 29.6% | B |
| 109 | ๐ฎ๐ท Iran | 67 | 30.8% | 100% | 92.4% | 29.6% | B |
| 110 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | 67 | 33.3% | 91.7% | 97.7% | 31.6% | B |
| 111 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ North Macedonia | 66 | 25.5% | 97.9% | 97.9% | 25.4% | B |
| 112 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyzstan | 66 | 27.9% | 100% | 94.4% | 27.3% | B |
| 113 | ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbekistan | 66 | 28.2% | 97.4% | 97.3% | 27.6% | B |
| 114 | ๐ฆ๐ด Angola | 66 | 28.6% | 97.1% | 96.5% | 27.9% | B |
| 115 | ๐ณ๐ฎ Nicaragua | 66 | 31% | 93.1% | 95.2% | 29.8% | B |
| 116 | ๐ฌ๐ณ Guinea | 66 | 28.6% | 100% | 93.1% | 27.9% | B |
| 117 | ๐น๐ฟ Tanzania | 65 | 26.9% | 94.2% | 95.9% | 26.5% | B |
| 118 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 65 | 32.1% | 82.1% | 98.7% | 30.7% | B |
| 119 | ๐น๐น Trinidad and Tobago | 65 | 26.1% | 95.7% | 98.1% | 25.9% | B |
| 120 | ๐ง๐ซ Burkina Faso | 65 | 25% | 100% | 94.2% | 25% | B |
| 121 | ๐บ๐ฌ Uganda | 64 | 26.1% | 91.3% | 95.8% | 25.9% | C |
| 122 | ๐จ๐ฌ Republic of the Congo | 64 | 22.2% | 100% | 96.5% | 22.8% | C |
| 123 | ๐ฑ๐ง Lebanon | 64 | 29.4% | 85.3% | 98.3% | 28.5% | C |
| 124 | ๐ท๐ช Rรฉunion | 64 | 22.2% | 100% | 95.5% | 22.8% | C |
| 125 | ๐ง๐ด Bolivia | 63 | 18.8% | 100% | 97.6% | 20% | C |
| 126 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 63 | 23.1% | 92.3% | 98.7% | 23.5% | C |
| 127 | ๐ฒ๐ด Macau | 63 | 22.2% | 94.4% | 98.2% | 22.8% | C |
| 128 | ๐ฌ๐ซ French Guiana | 62 | 18.2% | 100% | 94.1% | 19.6% | C |
| 129 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Cambodia | 61 | 24.3% | 82.9% | 97% | 24.4% | C |
| 130 | ๐ฌ๐ญ Ghana | 61 | 18% | 95.1% | 96.1% | 19.4% | C |
| 131 | ๐น๐ฏ Tajikistan | 61 | 14% | 100% | 96.8% | 16.2% | C |
| 132 | ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain | 61 | 16.7% | 96.7% | 98.3% | 18.4% | C |
| 133 | ๐ต๐ฌ Papua New Guinea | 61 | 13.3% | 100% | 98.6% | 15.6% | C |
| 134 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka | 61 | 25% | 83.3% | 97.2% | 25% | C |
| 135 | ๐ง๐ผ Botswana | 60 | 13.3% | 97.8% | 96.9% | 15.6% | C |
| 136 | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay | 58 | 11.1% | 94.4% | 98.3% | 13.9% | C |
| 137 | ๐ง๐ฟ Belize | 58 | 6.7% | 100% | 98.7% | 10.4% | C |
| 138 | ๐จ๐ฎ Ivory Coast | 58 | 8.3% | 100% | 97% | 11.6% | C |
| 139 | ๐น๐ฌ Togo | 58 | 9.1% | 100% | 96.5% | 12.3% | C |
| 140 | ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan | 56 | 10.7% | 89.3% | 96.4% | 13.6% | C |
| 141 | ๐ฌ๐ต Guadeloupe | 56 | 12% | 84% | 97.9% | 14.6% | C |
| 142 | ๐ฒ๐ผ Malawi | 56 | 4.3% | 100% | 94% | 8.4% | C |
| 143 | ๐ณ๐จ New Caledonia | 55 | 3.8% | 96.2% | 96.8% | 8% | C |
| 144 | ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait | 54 | 7.4% | 85.2% | 97.2% | 10.9% | C |
| 145 | ๐ฟ๐ฒ Zambia | 54 | 0% | 100% | 95.6% | 5% | C |
| 146 | ๐ป๐ฌ British Virgin Islands | 39 | 11.5% | 23.1% | 93.3% | 14.2% | D |
Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.
Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns
- ๐ป๐ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 39/100, Grade D) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (11.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฟ๐ฒ Zambia (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.4%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ณ๐จ New Caledonia (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฒ๐ผ Malawi (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (4.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฌ๐ต Guadeloupe (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (12%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (10.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐น๐ฌ Togo (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (9.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐จ๐ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
- ๐ง๐ฟ Belize (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ Very low DNSSEC adoption (6.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country
DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ like those in the European Union under GDPR โ tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.
In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.
The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.
This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the DNS privacy score measure?
The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.
Why does my country score poorly?
Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.
Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?
Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.
Which country has the best DNS privacy?
Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.
What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?
DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.
How often is this data updated?
Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.
Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?
Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.
How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?
We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.
Related
- DNS Privacy & Security Check โ test your personal DNS configuration
- Best Private DNS Servers โ recommended privacy-focused resolvers
- 2026 ISP DNS Report โ full NXDOMAIN hijacking analysis
- ISP DNS Servers by Country โ browse 4,367 ISPs