PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 147 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Bangladesh
    99 / 100
    A
  2. Dominican Republic
    99 / 100
    A
  3. Finland
    99 / 100
    A
  4. United States
    98 / 100
    A
  5. Canada
    98 / 100
    A
  6. Netherlands
    98 / 100
    A
  7. France
    97 / 100
    A
  8. United Kingdom
    97 / 100
    A
  9. South Africa
    97 / 100
    A
  10. Sweden
    97 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 147 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 99 99.4% 100% 97.2% 84.5% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 99 100% 100% 97.4% 85% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 99 97.5% 100% 98.2% 83% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 98 96% 99.3% 98.4% 81.8% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 98 96.1% 99.6% 98.5% 81.9% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 98 95.9% 99.8% 97.9% 81.7% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 97 93.3% 99.8% 98.2% 79.6% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 97 94.5% 99.5% 98.2% 80.6% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 97 95.1% 100% 96.7% 81.1% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 97 95.6% 98.7% 97.9% 81.5% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 97 93.4% 100% 97.9% 79.7% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 96 92.1% 99.6% 98.1% 78.7% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 96 92% 99.3% 98.1% 78.6% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 95 91.9% 99.2% 96.9% 78.5% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 95 90.9% 100% 97.1% 77.7% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 95 91.3% 99.2% 96.1% 78% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen 95 90% 100% 97.8% 77% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 94 87.3% 99.5% 97.1% 74.8% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 94 89.9% 96.1% 98.3% 76.9% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 94 90.7% 94.7% 97.8% 77.6% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 93 86.8% 100% 96.9% 74.4% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 93 86.3% 100% 96.6% 74% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 93 86.1% 100% 96.3% 73.9% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 93 86% 100% 96.1% 73.8% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 92 84.8% 100% 93.9% 72.8% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 92 83.3% 100% 98.8% 71.6% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 92 87% 93.5% 97.5% 74.6% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine 92 84.6% 100% 95% 72.7% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 91 81.8% 98.8% 98.2% 70.4% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 91 81.2% 100% 96.6% 70% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 91 82.1% 99.6% 95% 70.7% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 91 81.4% 99.4% 96% 70.1% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 91 84.6% 96.2% 96.6% 72.7% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 90 79.5% 99.5% 95.4% 68.6% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 90 78.9% 100% 96.4% 68.1% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 90 80.9% 94.2% 97.8% 69.7% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 90 79.9% 100% 97.1% 68.9% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 90 78.6% 100% 96.9% 67.9% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 89 77.3% 99.7% 97.7% 66.8% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 89 78.2% 98% 96.5% 67.6% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 89 76.8% 100% 97.4% 66.4% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 89 78.6% 96.4% 96.4% 67.9% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 89 78% 98% 96.9% 67.4% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 89 76.2% 100% 98.5% 66% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 89 76.5% 100% 97.2% 66.2% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 88 74.1% 100% 96.9% 64.3% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 88 73.8% 100% 96.8% 64% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 88 83.3% 83.3% 97.9% 71.6% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 87 72.8% 100% 96% 63.2% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 87 75% 98.2% 94.8% 65% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 87 74.3% 100% 94.4% 64.4% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 86 73.7% 94.7% 96.6% 64% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 85 68.2% 100% 96.3% 59.6% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 85 70.2% 97.6% 96.4% 61.2% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 85 73.9% 91.3% 97.6% 64.1% A
56 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 85 67.6% 100% 97.5% 59.1% A
57 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 84 68.2% 97.7% 96.9% 59.6% A
58 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 83 64.9% 100% 95% 56.9% A
59 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 83 63.6% 98.9% 96.7% 55.9% A
60 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 83 64.7% 100% 94.3% 56.8% A
61 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 83 68.5% 90.7% 97.4% 59.8% A
62 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 83 69.2% 92.3% 96.7% 60.4% A
63 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 83 65.2% 100% 95.9% 57.2% A
64 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 82 62% 98.7% 97% 54.6% A
65 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 82 62.9% 100% 95.4% 55.3% A
66 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 82 72.7% 81.8% 93.9% 63.2% A
67 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 81 61.3% 100% 94.6% 54% A
68 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 81 60% 100% 96.2% 53% A
69 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 80 57.1% 100% 97.7% 50.7% A
70 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 80 57.7% 100% 94.5% 51.2% A
71 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 79 54.5% 100% 96% 48.6% B
72 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 79 54.3% 100% 96.7% 48.4% B
73 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 79 58.8% 94.1% 95% 52% B
74 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 77 52.5% 100% 95.2% 47% B
75 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 77 57.7% 88.5% 96.6% 51.2% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 77 53.8% 97.4% 94.5% 48% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 77 56.7% 90% 97.6% 50.4% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 76 49.3% 100% 96.1% 44.4% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 76 50.7% 98.6% 95% 45.6% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 76 56.8% 86.4% 96.7% 50.4% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 76 57.1% 85.7% 96.6% 50.7% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 75 48.1% 97.6% 97.5% 43.5% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 74 46.2% 99.5% 94.7% 42% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 73 41.8% 100% 95.8% 38.4% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 73 42.1% 100% 94.7% 38.7% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 73 46.7% 93.3% 95.5% 42.4% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 72 41.2% 100% 95.2% 38% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 72 42.3% 92.3% 98.8% 38.8% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 72 40% 100% 96.1% 37% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 71 37.2% 100% 96.5% 34.8% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 71 51.5% 75.8% 96.6% 46.2% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 71 37.9% 100% 95.2% 35.3% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 71 42.9% 92.9% 94.7% 39.3% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 70 35.6% 100% 96.3% 33.5% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 70 37.2% 97.7% 96.3% 34.8% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 70 38.2% 97.1% 95.3% 35.6% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 70 37.5% 100% 94.1% 35% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 69 36.8% 94.7% 96.3% 34.4% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados 69 33.3% 100% 95.2% 31.6% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 68 31.5% 100% 96.4% 30.2% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 68 32.6% 96.6% 96.4% 31.1% B
102 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 68 31.3% 98.4% 95.4% 30% B
103 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 68 41.2% 82.4% 94.7% 38% B
104 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 67 33.3% 92.6% 94.9% 31.6% B
105 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 67 30% 100% 92.9% 29% B
106 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 66 25% 100% 97.2% 25% B
107 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 65 25% 100% 93.8% 25% B
108 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 65 31.3% 84.4% 98.5% 30% B
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 65 24.1% 100% 96.5% 24.3% B
110 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 65 27.8% 94.4% 93.7% 27.2% B
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 65 25% 100% 94.3% 25% B
112 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 64 27% 92% 94.2% 26.6% C
113 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 64 22% 98% 97.7% 22.6% C
114 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 64 26.5% 93.9% 94% 26.2% C
115 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 64 24.3% 97.3% 95.1% 24.4% C
116 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 64 22.2% 100% 95.7% 22.8% C
117 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 64 28.6% 85.7% 97.1% 27.9% C
118 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 64 25% 93.8% 95.2% 25% C
119 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 64 22.7% 100% 93.2% 23.2% C
120 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 64 21.1% 100% 95.8% 21.9% C
121 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 64 22.2% 100% 95.8% 22.8% C
122 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan 64 27.3% 90.9% 95.6% 26.8% C
123 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 63 20.3% 100% 95.3% 21.2% C
124 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 63 23.8% 95.2% 94.7% 24% C
125 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 63 20.5% 100% 95% 21.4% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 62 17.9% 96.4% 98.2% 19.3% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 62 20% 95% 97% 21% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 61 17.3% 100% 94.2% 18.8% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 61 17.4% 100% 90.3% 18.9% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana 61 15.4% 100% 96.3% 17.3% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan 61 15.4% 100% 95.2% 17.3% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 60 11.1% 100% 97.8% 13.9% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 59 20.8% 83.2% 95% 21.6% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 59 12.5% 97.9% 95.7% 15% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 59 12.5% 95.8% 98% 15% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 58 10.5% 94.7% 96.8% 13.4% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 58 7.1% 100% 98% 10.7% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 58 18.2% 81.8% 96.7% 19.6% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo 58 9.1% 100% 94.8% 12.3% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 57 8.7% 100% 91.1% 12% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 57 6.3% 100% 95.2% 10% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 57 7.1% 100% 95.2% 10.7% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 56 12.5% 87.5% 94.8% 15% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 55 3.6% 96.4% 95.3% 7.9% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 55 11.5% 80.8% 97.8% 14.2% C
146 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 55 12% 84% 95.9% 14.6% C
147 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 42 14.8% 25.9% 95.5% 16.8% D

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 42/100, Grade D) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (14.8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (12%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (11.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.6%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (12.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (6.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (9.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related