PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 145 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Dominican Republic
    100 / 100
    A
  2. Bangladesh
    99 / 100
    A
  3. United States
    98 / 100
    A
  4. Canada
    98 / 100
    A
  5. Finland
    98 / 100
    A
  6. France
    97 / 100
    A
  7. United Kingdom
    97 / 100
    A
  8. South Africa
    97 / 100
    A
  9. Sweden
    97 / 100
    A
  10. Ecuador
    97 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 145 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 100 100% 100% 98.4% 85% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 99 99% 100% 97.8% 84.2% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 98 95.7% 99.2% 98.8% 81.6% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 98 96.5% 99.6% 99.1% 82.2% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 98 96.4% 100% 98.5% 82.1% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 97 93.1% 99.7% 98.8% 79.5% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 97 94.5% 99.6% 98.7% 80.6% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 97 94.5% 100% 97.1% 80.6% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 97 94.5% 98% 98.7% 80.6% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 97 93.5% 100% 98.5% 79.8% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 96 91.4% 99.5% 98.7% 78.1% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 96 91.8% 99.4% 97.3% 78.4% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 96 91.8% 99.3% 98.7% 78.4% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 95 89.8% 100% 97.9% 76.8% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 94 89.4% 96% 99% 76.5% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 94 87.6% 100% 97.3% 75.1% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 94 87.3% 100% 98.2% 74.8% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 94 88.8% 99.1% 96.3% 76% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 94 90.3% 94.4% 99% 77.2% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 94 87.3% 100% 96.6% 74.8% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 94 88.6% 100% 97.1% 75.9% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 93 86.2% 99.4% 98% 74% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 92 84.2% 98.7% 98.9% 72.4% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 92 85.1% 97.9% 96.4% 73.1% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 91 80.6% 100% 96.9% 69.5% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 91 81.7% 99.4% 96.6% 70.4% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 91 81.4% 100% 98.8% 70.1% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 90 81.7% 99.6% 94.8% 70.4% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 90 81.4% 95.2% 98.4% 70.1% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 90 80.9% 97.9% 96.9% 69.7% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 90 84.1% 90.9% 98.1% 72.3% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 89 78.1% 99.7% 96% 67.5% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 89 76.3% 100% 98.3% 66% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 89 78.1% 100% 96.5% 67.5% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 89 77.7% 100% 97% 67.2% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 89 76.4% 100% 96.2% 66.1% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 89 78% 100% 97% 67.4% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 89 77.6% 98.3% 97.6% 67.1% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 89 75% 100% 98.8% 65% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 89 79.2% 95.8% 97.9% 68.4% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 89 81.8% 90.9% 98% 70.4% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine 89 76.9% 100% 97% 66.5% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 88 76.2% 99.5% 95.7% 66% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 88 75.5% 97.1% 96.6% 65.4% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 88 75.6% 100% 97.3% 65.5% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 88 75% 100% 97.6% 65% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 88 80% 90% 98.9% 69% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 88 73.5% 100% 98.2% 63.8% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 88 75% 100% 95.3% 65% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 88 83.3% 83.3% 98.4% 71.6% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 88 75% 100% 96.3% 65% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 87 73.1% 97.4% 97.5% 63.5% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 87 74.3% 100% 94.7% 64.4% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 86 70% 100% 96.9% 61% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 85 68% 100% 96.8% 59.4% A
56 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 85 69% 100% 97.4% 60.2% A
57 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 84 65.6% 100% 95.9% 57.5% A
58 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 84 65.8% 100% 98% 57.6% A
59 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 83 66.7% 94.4% 98.5% 58.4% A
60 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 83 65.9% 97.7% 97.3% 57.7% A
61 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 82 62.8% 97.4% 97% 55.2% A
62 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 82 62.7% 100% 94.5% 55.2% A
63 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 82 61% 100% 95.8% 53.8% A
64 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 81 70.2% 83% 94.8% 61.2% A
65 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 81 61.8% 97.1% 95.1% 54.4% A
66 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 81 62.5% 93.8% 96.7% 55% A
67 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 81 60% 100% 94.8% 53% A
68 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 80 55.9% 100% 97.5% 49.7% A
69 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 79 55.9% 100% 95.5% 49.7% B
70 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 79 55.2% 100% 95% 49.2% B
71 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 79 55.1% 100% 97.6% 49.1% B
72 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 79 55.6% 100% 95.9% 49.5% B
73 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 78 52.8% 100% 98% 47.2% B
74 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 78 57.6% 90.9% 97.2% 51.1% B
75 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 78 55.2% 100% 94.5% 49.2% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 78 56.3% 93.8% 95% 50% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 77 56.9% 88.2% 96.7% 50.5% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 76 48.6% 100% 96.9% 43.9% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 76 54.5% 86.4% 97.4% 48.6% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 75 46.4% 97.8% 98% 42.1% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 75 50% 92.9% 95.2% 45% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 74 43.8% 100% 94.8% 40% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 74 46.9% 96.9% 96.3% 42.5% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 73 42% 99.6% 94.8% 38.6% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 73 42.3% 100% 96.4% 38.8% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 73 42.9% 100% 95.4% 39.3% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 73 47.1% 94.1% 94.6% 42.7% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 73 46.2% 92.3% 96.8% 42% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 72 39.3% 100% 96.6% 36.4% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 72 40.9% 100% 96.1% 37.7% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 72 40.9% 95.5% 98.9% 37.7% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados 72 40% 100% 96.8% 37% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 71 38.3% 100% 95.5% 35.6% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 71 38.9% 100% 95.6% 36.1% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 70 35% 100% 95.3% 33% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 69 33.5% 100% 96.6% 31.8% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 69 34.1% 97.6% 97.5% 32.3% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 69 47.1% 76.5% 96.4% 42.7% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 69 37.5% 91.7% 97.5% 35% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 68 31.7% 98.3% 96% 30.4% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 68 31.6% 100% 95.3% 30.3% B
102 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 67 31.5% 94.6% 97.1% 30.2% B
103 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 67 29.3% 100% 95.7% 28.4% B
104 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 67 32.7% 93.9% 96.8% 31.2% B
105 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 67 27.6% 100% 96.5% 27.1% B
106 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 67 33.3% 93.3% 95.5% 31.6% B
107 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 66 28% 98% 96.9% 27.4% B
108 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 66 27.9% 100% 93.8% 27.3% B
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 66 27.8% 97.2% 95.1% 27.2% B
110 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 66 30% 93.3% 96.5% 29% B
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 66 25.9% 100% 96.5% 25.7% B
112 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 65 23.1% 100% 96.5% 23.5% B
113 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 65 23.7% 100% 98.1% 24% B
114 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 65 25.7% 100% 95.6% 25.6% B
115 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 65 31.4% 85.7% 97.7% 30.1% B
116 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 65 34.5% 79.3% 98.7% 32.6% B
117 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 65 27.3% 100% 90.9% 26.8% B
118 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 65 26.3% 94.7% 97.4% 26% B
119 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 65 25% 100% 96.2% 25% B
120 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 64 26.7% 91.1% 96% 26.4% C
121 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 64 26.9% 94.2% 94.3% 26.5% C
122 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 64 23.1% 100% 93% 23.5% C
123 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 62 17.2% 96.6% 98.3% 18.8% C
124 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 62 18.2% 95.5% 98.3% 19.6% C
125 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 61 18.3% 95% 95.3% 19.6% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 61 17.6% 100% 91.8% 19.1% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 61 30% 80% 89.6% 29% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 60 23.9% 82.9% 95.5% 24.1% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 60 14% 100% 96.1% 16.2% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 60 14% 97.7% 97% 16.2% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 60 12.5% 100% 98.3% 15% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan 60 20% 90% 94.8% 21% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 58 13.8% 89.7% 96.2% 16% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 58 13% 91.3% 97.3% 15.4% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 58 11.1% 94.4% 98.4% 13.9% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 58 8.3% 100% 96.6% 11.6% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo 58 8.3% 100% 97.3% 11.6% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 58 18.2% 81.8% 97.3% 19.6% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 57 6.3% 100% 95.7% 10% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 57 6.7% 100% 97.7% 10.4% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 55 3.4% 96.6% 96.5% 7.7% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 55 4.8% 100% 91.9% 8.8% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 54 8.3% 83.3% 97.2% 11.6% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 53 8% 80% 98% 11.4% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 41 11.5% 23.1% 98.2% 14.2% D

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 41/100, Grade D) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (11.5%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 54/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (4.8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (3.4%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (6.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (6.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.3%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related