PublicDNS.info Live-tested public DNS
Retested every 72 hours.

DNS Privacy Score by Country

How private and secure is DNS infrastructure in your country? Ranked by DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, and resolver reliability. Updated .

These scores are calculated from live probe data โ€” not self-reported claims. We test 146 countries with 10+ resolvers each, drawn from a database of 109,644+ servers probed every 72 hours. The score reflects real, measured behaviour of DNS infrastructure in each country.

DNSSEC Rate (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers that validate DNSSEC signatures, protecting against DNS spoofing.

Hijacking-Free (25 pts)

Percentage of resolvers returning proper NXDOMAIN instead of redirecting to ISP ad/search pages.

Reliability (25 pts)

Average uptime reliability of live resolvers, measured by our 72-hour probe cycle.

Encrypted DNS (25 pts)

Estimated availability of DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS among the country's resolvers.

Top 10 Most Privacy-Friendly DNS Countries

Ranked by composite privacy score across DNSSEC, hijacking, reliability, and encrypted DNS.

  1. Bangladesh
    99 / 100
    A
  2. Peru
    99 / 100
    A
  3. Finland
    99 / 100
    A
  4. Eswatini
    99 / 100
    A
  5. Canada
    98 / 100
    A
  6. Dominican Republic
    98 / 100
    A
  7. United Kingdom
    97 / 100
    A
  8. South Africa
    97 / 100
    A
  9. United States
    96 / 100
    A
  10. France
    96 / 100
    A

Full Country Rankings

DNS privacy scores for 146 countries, sortable by rank, score, DNSSEC adoption, hijacking rates, reliability, encrypted DNS, and grade
Rank Country Score DNSSEC % Hijack-Free % Reliability % Encrypted % Grade
1 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh 99 99.2% 100% 97.7% 84.4% A
2 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru 99 98.2% 100% 97.7% 83.6% A
3 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 99 97.7% 100% 99.4% 83.2% A
4 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Eswatini 99 100% 100% 95.7% 85% A
5 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 98 96.7% 99.6% 99.4% 82.4% A
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic 98 97.6% 100% 98.1% 83.1% A
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 97 93.3% 99.3% 98.9% 79.6% A
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 97 94.8% 99.8% 97.6% 80.8% A
9 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 96 92.4% 98.5% 98% 78.9% A
10 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 96 92.2% 99.8% 99.1% 78.8% A
11 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 96 93.4% 99.2% 97.3% 79.7% A
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 96 91.9% 99.1% 98.8% 78.5% A
13 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 96 92.9% 97% 99% 79.3% A
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 95 90.3% 99.5% 99% 77.2% A
15 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador 95 89.3% 100% 98.9% 76.4% A
16 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 95 90.9% 100% 98% 77.7% A
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 95 91.6% 100% 95.8% 78.3% A
18 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela 94 90.3% 100% 94.3% 77.2% A
19 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 93 85.4% 97.4% 98.4% 73.3% A
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 93 87.5% 98.4% 97.5% 75% A
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya 93 86.8% 100% 96.2% 74.4% A
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 92 83.5% 100% 97% 71.8% A
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 92 86.2% 93.1% 99.5% 74% A
24 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkiye 92 85.7% 97.1% 95.6% 73.6% A
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 91 81.4% 97.1% 98.1% 70.1% A
26 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman 91 80.9% 100% 97.2% 69.7% A
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 91 86.1% 88.9% 98.7% 73.9% A
28 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 91 84% 96% 96.6% 72.2% A
29 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 91 89.5% 84.2% 99.5% 76.6% A
30 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 90 78.9% 98.4% 99% 68.1% A
31 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 90 79.7% 99.6% 95.5% 68.8% A
32 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 90 79.4% 99.2% 96.5% 68.5% A
33 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 90 79.6% 98.1% 97.1% 68.7% A
34 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia 90 82% 98% 94.5% 70.6% A
35 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 90 79.4% 100% 95.8% 68.5% A
36 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan 90 80.8% 100% 96% 69.6% A
37 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 89 77.2% 100% 96.2% 66.8% A
38 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 89 76.8% 100% 98.3% 66.4% A
39 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 89 76.8% 100% 97% 66.4% A
40 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 89 77.4% 100% 96.7% 66.9% A
41 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 89 76.9% 100% 98.2% 66.5% A
42 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra 89 76.9% 100% 97% 66.5% A
43 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 88 75.7% 98.4% 96.5% 65.6% A
44 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 88 76.9% 99.5% 95.2% 66.5% A
45 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 88 74.1% 100% 98.3% 64.3% A
46 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 88 76.3% 97.4% 98.3% 66% A
47 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 88 75.9% 96.6% 98.9% 65.7% A
48 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 87 73.2% 99.2% 97.3% 63.6% A
49 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 87 78.9% 86.8% 99.3% 68.1% A
50 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 86 69.9% 99.1% 97.3% 60.9% A
51 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 86 71.2% 100% 96.1% 62% A
52 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria 85 67.9% 100% 95.8% 59.3% A
53 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 85 69.4% 100% 96.4% 60.5% A
54 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia 85 72% 92% 98.9% 62.6% A
55 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 84 72.3% 87.1% 98.6% 62.8% A
56 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica 84 67.2% 100% 96% 58.8% A
57 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 84 70% 92.5% 98.3% 61% A
58 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 84 68.4% 97.4% 96.9% 59.7% A
59 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo 84 73.1% 92.3% 93.1% 63.5% A
60 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 84 70.6% 88.2% 99% 61.5% A
61 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania 83 64.3% 100% 96.7% 56.4% A
62 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia 83 69.6% 91.3% 96.3% 60.7% A
63 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia 83 63.6% 100% 98.8% 55.9% A
64 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus 83 65% 100% 95.9% 57% A
65 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 82 62.3% 97.1% 97% 54.8% A
66 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay 81 60.5% 100% 96% 53.4% A
67 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya 81 63.4% 90.2% 97.8% 55.7% A
68 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 81 64% 92% 97.7% 56.2% A
69 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Rico 81 60% 100% 95.3% 53% A
70 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 80 58.3% 100% 96.3% 51.6% A
71 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 80 56.4% 100% 96.4% 50.1% A
72 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 80 55.9% 100% 98% 49.7% A
73 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt 80 58.3% 95.8% 97.3% 51.6% A
74 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia 80 57.1% 100% 95.5% 50.7% A
75 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 79 56.4% 100% 94.5% 50.1% B
76 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon 79 59.1% 90.9% 98% 52.3% B
77 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 79 58.8% 94.1% 95.9% 52% B
78 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 78 57.9% 89.5% 97.9% 51.3% B
79 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia 78 53.3% 100% 94.4% 47.6% B
80 ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo 77 50% 100% 96.9% 45% B
81 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia 77 53.6% 96.4% 95.2% 47.9% B
82 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macau 77 50% 100% 96.1% 45% B
83 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe 76 51.6% 96.8% 93.1% 46.3% B
84 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 76 47.8% 100% 96.1% 43.2% B
85 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea 76 50% 100% 95.2% 45% B
86 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia 76 50% 100% 93.4% 45% B
87 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique 75 48.4% 96.8% 96.8% 43.7% B
88 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 75 47.1% 100% 95% 42.7% B
89 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan 75 50% 91.7% 96.2% 45% B
90 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius 75 45.5% 100% 98.7% 41.4% B
91 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 74 43.9% 97.4% 97% 40.1% B
92 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador 74 54.5% 81.8% 96% 48.6% B
93 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda 74 42.1% 100% 98.7% 38.7% B
94 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea 74 44.4% 100% 94% 40.5% B
95 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama 74 50% 88.9% 97.8% 45% B
96 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan 73 43.2% 100% 96.1% 39.6% B
97 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 72 40.1% 99.4% 94.5% 37.1% B
98 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar 72 41.3% 96.3% 96.2% 38% B
99 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria 72 41.2% 100% 93.4% 38% B
100 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan 71 37.9% 96.6% 96.8% 35.3% B
101 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica 71 36.8% 100% 95.6% 34.4% B
102 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan 70 35.6% 100% 97.1% 33.5% B
103 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia 70 36% 98% 97.5% 33.8% B
104 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso 70 35.3% 100% 96.6% 33.2% B
105 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin 70 35.3% 100% 97.6% 33.2% B
106 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 70 33.3% 100% 99.3% 31.6% B
107 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ช Rรฉunion 70 40% 90% 99.6% 37% B
108 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines 69 35% 100% 94% 33% B
109 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos 69 35.8% 94.3% 96.4% 33.6% B
110 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola 69 33.3% 96.7% 97.1% 31.6% B
111 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro 69 32.1% 100% 96.5% 30.7% B
112 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal 68 32.7% 98.1% 96.7% 31.2% B
113 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia 68 31.1% 100% 96.7% 29.9% B
114 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq 68 31% 100% 96.4% 29.8% B
115 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 68 29.6% 100% 98.4% 28.7% B
116 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 68 34.8% 100% 89.6% 32.8% B
117 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua 68 31.8% 95.5% 96.9% 30.4% B
118 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 68 38.5% 84.6% 96.3% 35.8% B
119 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡บ Guam 68 45.5% 72.7% 95.4% 41.4% B
120 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia 67 29.6% 100% 95.1% 28.7% B
121 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana 66 27.9% 95.1% 96.4% 27.3% B
122 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 66 29.2% 93.8% 96% 28.4% B
123 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados 66 27.3% 100% 96.3% 26.8% B
124 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda 65 30.6% 88.9% 94.6% 29.5% B
125 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan 64 20.5% 100% 97.2% 21.4% C
126 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay 64 25% 91.7% 98.2% 25% C
127 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo 63 18.8% 100% 96.7% 20% C
128 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ivory Coast 63 20% 100% 95.1% 21% C
129 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea 62 16.7% 100% 97.8% 18.4% C
130 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan 62 20% 100% 89.9% 21% C
131 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana 61 16.2% 97.3% 96.2% 18% C
132 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 61 15.4% 96.2% 98.3% 17.3% C
133 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi 61 14.3% 100% 96.5% 16.4% C
134 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina 61 20% 90% 98.5% 21% C
135 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia 60 21.6% 82.5% 97.7% 22.3% C
136 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 60 20.8% 83.3% 98.8% 21.6% C
137 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan 60 17.4% 91.3% 98.8% 18.9% C
138 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana 60 16.7% 91.7% 98.2% 18.4% C
139 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago 58 8.7% 95.7% 98.8% 12% C
140 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize 58 7.7% 100% 98.5% 11.2% C
141 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia 57 7.1% 100% 95.7% 10.7% C
142 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe 56 12% 84% 96.7% 14.6% C
143 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 55 1% 99% 99.6% 5.8% C
144 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia 53 0% 96.4% 96.3% 5% C
145 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait 53 8% 80% 98.1% 11.4% C
146 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands 44 17.9% 28.6% 92.9% 19.3% D

Data reflects probe results as of March 2026. Only countries with 10+ live-tested resolvers are included. Encrypted DNS % is estimated from DNSSEC adoption correlation.

Countries with Significant DNS Privacy Concerns

  • ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฌ British Virgin Islands (Score: 44/100, Grade D) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ New Caledonia (Score: 53/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (0%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China (Score: 55/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต Guadeloupe (Score: 56/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (12%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia (Score: 57/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.1%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (7.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago (Score: 58/100, Grade C) โ€” Very low DNSSEC adoption (8.7%), leaving users vulnerable to DNS spoofing.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ซ French Guiana (Score: 60/100, Grade C) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan (Score: 60/100, Grade C) โ€” Significant NXDOMAIN hijacking detected among resolvers.

Why DNS Privacy Varies by Country

DNS privacy is not a universal standard. The quality and security of a country's DNS infrastructure depends on a complex interplay of government regulation, ISP commercial incentives, technical capacity, and user awareness. Countries with strong data protection laws โ€” like those in the European Union under GDPR โ€” tend to have higher DNSSEC adoption and less DNS hijacking, because regulators actively discourage practices that compromise user privacy.

In contrast, many ISPs in countries with weaker privacy regulation practise NXDOMAIN hijacking, replacing standard error responses with their own search or advertising pages. This generates revenue for the ISP but exposes users to tracking and breaks applications that rely on correct DNS error handling. Some governments mandate DNS-level content filtering, which structurally reduces privacy scores because resolvers are configured to intercept and modify responses rather than pass them through faithfully.

The good news is that individual users are not bound by their country's DNS infrastructure. Switching to a public encrypted DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Quad9 (9.9.9.9) takes minutes and immediately bypasses ISP DNS regardless of where you are located. Enabling DNS-over-HTTPS in your browser or DNS-over-TLS on your device encrypts your queries, preventing ISPs from monitoring or modifying them even if local infrastructure is poor.

This data was collected by our automated probe infrastructure, which tests every resolver in our database on a 72-hour cycle from Europe. Each resolver receives a standard A-record query, a NXDOMAIN hijacking test, and a DNSSEC validation check using dnssec-failed.org. Scores are calculated from the aggregate results. Limitations include geographic bias in latency measurements (probes originate from Europe), thinner IPv6 coverage, and the possibility that some resolvers behave differently under load or for specific query types.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the DNS privacy score measure?

The score combines four metrics: DNSSEC validation rate (how many resolvers verify cryptographic signatures), hijacking-free rate (how many resolvers return proper NXDOMAIN errors instead of redirecting to ad pages), resolver reliability (average uptime), and estimated encrypted DNS availability (DoH/DoT support). Each metric is worth 25 points for a maximum of 100.

Why does my country score poorly?

Low scores typically result from ISPs that practice NXDOMAIN hijacking (redirecting failed lookups to search/ad pages), low DNSSEC adoption among local resolvers, or unreliable DNS infrastructure. Government-mandated DNS filtering can also reduce scores if resolvers are configured to block or redirect queries.

Does a high country score mean my DNS is private?

Not necessarily. The country score reflects the overall DNS infrastructure, not your personal configuration. Even in a high-scoring country, your specific ISP may still hijack DNS or lack DNSSEC. Use our DNS Privacy Check tool to test your actual DNS setup.

Which country has the best DNS privacy?

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland) and Western European nations (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) consistently score highest due to strong DNSSEC adoption, minimal hijacking, and reliable infrastructure. However, individual users in any country can achieve excellent privacy by using a public encrypted DNS provider.

What is DNSSEC and why does it matter for privacy?

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing attackers from forging responses and redirecting you to malicious sites. While DNSSEC primarily provides integrity rather than confidentiality, it is a fundamental building block of DNS security. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC are also more likely to support modern privacy features like encrypted DNS.

How often is this data updated?

Our probe infrastructure tests every resolver in the database on a 72-hour cycle. The country scores on this page are recalculated from the latest probe data and cached for one hour. The scores reflect real, measured behaviour โ€” not self-reported claims by ISPs or governments.

Can I improve my DNS privacy regardless of my country's score?

Yes. Switch to a privacy-focused public DNS provider like Cloudflare (1.1.1.1), Quad9 (9.9.9.9), or Google (8.8.8.8) with encrypted DNS enabled (DoH or DoT). This bypasses your ISP's DNS entirely, regardless of your country's infrastructure quality.

How is the encrypted DNS availability score calculated?

We estimate encrypted DNS availability using DNSSEC adoption as a proxy indicator, since resolvers that validate DNSSEC are significantly more likely to also support DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Direct DoT probing (port 853) data is incorporated where available. This is an approximation and we are expanding direct encrypted DNS testing coverage.

Related